Archive for the ‘ Chris Matthews ’ Category

MSNBC – Truth and Opinion

Written by PeacockWatch on December 12, 2009.

The British politician, Edmund Burke is quoted in Thomas Carlyle’s book “Heros and Hero Worship in History” as follows. “Burke said that there were three Estates in Parliament, but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sat a fourth Estate more important far than they all.”

Edmund Burke would be aghast at the power and influence of the fourth estate today. Political columns are written within hours after an event has taken place and then transmitted across continents and even around the world. Within just a few more hours they are printed, distributed, read and accepted either as gospel or biased opinion. Television and radio report information to hundreds of millions, perhaps a couple of billion, as it takes place. Commentators add their own spin within minutes and add improbable elements to that spin as the story is analyzed and dissected among themselves and with “experts” until it becomes as worn as a months old newspaper passed among greedy readers.

It is indeed true today that the fourth estate is far more important than our government. The media has more power than ever before to get people elected or removed permanently from public service. Interestingly enough, media today is generally owned by massive conglomerates with elements that might be dependent upon elected officials for income from government contracts. Our government officials and the media consequently operate in total complicity to assure the health of their mutual interests. In this incestuous relationship the fourth estate has become more important, more powerful, totally complicit with and integrated with the government. It influences legislation much more than it did in Burke’s day. That influence is clearly for reasons much less pure today than they were in the 1700’s.

PeacockWatch is especially concerned about the objectives and intentions of MSNBC. In a recent article PeacockWatch took MSNBC’s Chris Matthews to task when he said of Obama’s speech at West Point “he went to maybe the enemy camp tonight”. On November 30th, 2009 we have Keith Olbermann saying in an MSNBC article on Afghanistan that “the Pentagon is a bunch of perpetually 12-year old boys”. Matthews later offered an apology for his statement. However, that apology was thrown into disbelief by the context of his overall comments. His apology falls into the category of total fantasy given his associate Keith Olbermann’s insult to our military defenders.

The dislike these two men have for the military becomes easy to understand when one remembers that it is the military men and women who have fought so hard against socialism and Marxism in the last few major wars. And socialism and Marxism are what MSNBC is supporting so strongly today when they champion the present administration and its group of czars. If our military is strong, and continues to be the most respected of all government agencies, then socialism and Marxism will have a more difficult time in the rest of the world and not have the full support in the U.S. that Obama and his spokespeople at MSNBC desire.

Just as part of the agenda of MSNBC is to denigrate our highly respected and heroic military it is also focused on supporting the public option health plan (See PeacockWatch article “NBC’s Support for ‘Public Option’ at an All Time High”) which is the cornerstone of the move toward socialism in the U.S. and “The Big Lie of Global Warming” which is a supporting strategy.

It has been reported, though only very minimally on MSNBC, that the health care program means a takeover by the government of another 1/6th of the U.S. economy which would be the dream of any avowed socialist. It was also recently reported by the NY Times and CBS (with great publicity from MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann) that support for the health care public option according to a December 4th through 8th poll is now at 59% with only 29% opposed. On the contrary, a Bloomberg poll during the same period, and not mentioned at all by MSNBC, shows that 62% of Americans are mostly pessimistic about the benefit of a health care bill that Congress would pass. A Quinnipiac University poll as reported by the Washington Times shows 52% of voters oppose and 38% support the current Congressional health care reform bill. There are many other polls with varying results but MSNBC consistently reports only on those that support the current administration for which they are the primary media outlet and from which their parent organization receives great financial favor.

Edmund Burke was right about the importance of the “fourth Estate”. One wonders how corrupt the media was in the mid-1700’s and if elements of it were as strongly influenced by a particular party as MSNBC so clearly is today. Whatever the answer, it is clear that MSNBC and its commentators Olbermann and Matthews have it as key objectives to denigrate our military through subtle and not so subtle opinion commentary and to report only that information supporting the take over of health care by the federal government. Those two key MSNBC objectives support one overarching Obama administration goal of transforming the United States of America into a socialist empire as quickly as possible.

Popularity: unranked [?]

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

The Real “Enemy Camp”

Written by PeacockWatch on December 8, 2009.

If Chris Matthews were a young cub reporter one might say he was indiscreet in his comments. But he is not. He has decades of experience. According to his MSNBC News biography:
“Matthews spent 15 years in politics and government: he worked in the White House for four years under President Jimmy Carter as a Presidential speechwriter and on the Government Reorganization Project, in the U.S. Senate for five years on the staffs of Senator Frank Moss (Utah) and Senator Edmund Muskie (Maine), and was the top aide for Speaker of the House Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill, Jr. for six years.”
Matthews was a print journalist for 15 years and has been with CNBC and MSNBC since 1997.
One could say he has a lot of experience and it is clear that he is very solid in his liberal beliefs. So, when he says about Obama’s visit to West Point that “he went to maybe the enemy camp tonight” Matthews is saying what he means.
It is interesting that Matthews observes about the West Point cadets and their officers that he “didn’t see a lot of warmth in that crowd”. To some extent that could have been because “that crowd”, ready to dedicate their lives to democracy and freedom, had already been in their seats for four to five hours for security reasons while waiting for the commander-in-chief that they have already sworn allegiance to upon entering the academy. Moreover, Matthews opines that the “crowd” seems to be regarding Obama with “if not resentment, skepticism”. Mr. Matthews and Peacock must have been watching two different presentations because Peacock saw none of that. However, a healthy skepticism from these soldiers might have been appropriate. After all this Commander-in-Chief might be ordering any and all of them off to war upon their graduation. It would certainly be appropriate for them, as leaders in training, to be taking the measure of the man. As students in one of the best universities in the world they would certainly have done their homework and known much about their top leader.
These soldier leaders in training would understand the irony of listening to this man in this commemorative Eisenhower Hall while knowing that he is making all the political and economic moves required to transition our country from a free democracy to a socialist state. They would also be fully aware that they are the current link in a chain of military men going back over 200 years who fought, got maimed or died to preserve our democracy that our founding fathers gave their lives, fortunes and sacred honor for. Peacock saw a lot of tired faces of hard working students in the crowd. Peacock saw a lot of people paying close attention and seeming to evaluate what they were hearing. Peacock didn’t see the skepticism that Matthews saw. However, a very healthy skepticism would have been in order.
These military men and women had to be evaluating the words they were hearing that night and comparing them to words they had heard their President say at other times.
Jan. 26, 2009: “All too often the United States starts by dictating … and we don’t always know all the factors that are involved. So let’s listen. And I think if we do that, then there’s a possibility at least of achieving some breakthroughs. … My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect.” – President Obama, in an interview with Al Arabiya
That is tremendously conciliatory language to use when talking with Al Arabiya journalists while soldiers are dying in the middle east.
April 2, 2009: “I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world.” – President Obama, at G20 summit in London
The graves of American soldiers all across the world are silent testimony to the greatness of America’s standing in the world. Perhaps these future leaders of men were wondering what kind of leader would make such a crass and self-serving statement while outside of our country. Perhaps some of them were wondering what this President might be saying at some future date while they were fighting in some distant country to save the democracy that Obama was “fundamentally” changing into socialism. Perhaps some of them were comparing this President’s actions with those of Winston Churchill who said “When I am abroad, I always make it a rule never to criticize or attack the government of my own country”.
April 2, 2009: “It is true, as my Italian friend has said, that the (economic) crisis began in the U.S. I take responsibility, even if I wasn’t even president at the time.” – President Obama, at the G20 in London, as reported by Germany’s Der Spiegel
Yet another apology, and a totally inaccurate statement, at an inappropriate location and the loss of another opportunity to speak to America’s strengths preserved by generations of soldiers and earmarked by many square miles of overseas American military cemeteries.
April 6: “I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that the trust that binds us has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.” – President Obama, in Ankara, Turkey
Certainly some might be saying “Tell it to the Ayatollah’s!”
It would be difficult to criticize the young men and women at West Point for possibly reflecting on this President’s comments while he was making a war speech that didn’t even support the minimum recommendation of his battlefield commander. Perhaps some of them were wondering if they would be among the last officers leading men on a dangerous battlefield fighting a rear guard action 18 months from then as they were making the withdrawal from Afganistan that the commander-in-chief was pre-announcing to the enemy.
By way of contrast, it apparently was easy for Chris Matthews to make these criticisms and name these future defenders of a free America the “enemy camp”. It was apparently easy for Chris Matthews to name this oldest military academy in our country and the site of a major Revolutionary War stand by George Washington a “strange venue” for a major war speech about troop deployment. Perhaps Matthews thought that Paddy’s Irish Pub would be more appropriate.
You see, it wasn’t just Matthew’s comment about West Point being the enemy camp that was so crassly inappropriate. It was his criticism of the cadets and their officers. It was his perception of “resentment, criticism” that was neither voiced nor visible to others. Perhaps Matthews was seeing what he wanted to see because he didn’t sense a collective tingle running up the legs of all these uniformed people at the sight of the man Matthews has expressed such gushing adoration for. It was Matthews’ sense of this entirely appropriate hall named for one of our greatest defenders of democracy against socialism, Marxism and fascism as a “strange venue”.
Many in this “crowd” that Matthew’s was so critical of will make a career of defending our country and declaring themselves ready to defend their President with their lives even if their President was overseas inappropriately apologizing for our great country and our courageous military. Quite a few will find themselves in the real “enemy camp” fighting, and perhaps dying, for Chris Matthews right to be crass.
Chris Matthews apologized later in his telecast for calling Eisenhower Hall the “enemy camp”. In the context of the rest of his words on this subject his apology can’t be accepted. It is clear that this journalist with decades of experience on the national level meant exactly what he said. His apology smacks of the man who got caught in an illegal or embarrassing act begging forgiveness not because he is sorry but because he got caught.
Mr. Matthews, you are simply a scoundrel whose words precisely describe your feeling toward our military and our future military leaders. You will receive no forgiveness here.

If Chris Matthews were a young cub reporter one might say he was indiscreet in his comments. But he is not. He has decades of experience. According to his MSNBC News biography:

“Matthews spent 15 years in politics and government: he worked in the White House for four years under President Jimmy Carter as a Presidential speechwriter and on the Government Reorganization Project, in the U.S. Senate for five years on the staffs of Senator Frank Moss (Utah) and Senator Edmund Muskie (Maine), and was the top aide for Speaker of the House Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill, Jr. for six years.”

Matthews was a print journalist for 15 years and has been with CNBC and MSNBC since 1997.

One could say he has a lot of experience and it is clear that he is very solid in his liberal beliefs. So, when he says about Obama’s visit to West Point that “he went to maybe the enemy camp tonight” Matthews is saying what he means.

It is interesting that Matthews observes about the West Point cadets and their officers that he “didn’t see a lot of warmth in that crowd”. To some extent that could have been because “that crowd”, ready to dedicate their lives to democracy and freedom, had already been in their seats for four to five hours for security reasons while waiting for the commander-in-chief that they have already sworn allegiance to upon entering the academy. Moreover, Matthews opines that the “crowd” seems to be regarding Obama with “if not resentment, skepticism”. Mr. Matthews and Peacock must have been watching two different presentations because Peacock saw none of that. However, a healthy skepticism from these soldiers might have been appropriate. After all this Commander-in-Chief might be ordering any and all of them off to war upon their graduation. It would certainly be appropriate for them, as leaders in training, to be taking the measure of the man. As students in one of the best universities in the world they would certainly have done their homework and known much about their top leader.

These soldier leaders in training would understand the irony of listening to this man in this commemorative Eisenhower Hall while knowing that he is making all the political and economic moves required to transition our country from a free democracy to a socialist state. They would also be fully aware that they are the current link in a chain of military men going back over 200 years who fought, got maimed or died to preserve our democracy that our founding fathers gave their lives, fortunes and sacred honor for. Peacock saw a lot of tired faces of hard working students in the crowd. Peacock saw a lot of people paying close attention and seeming to evaluate what they were hearing. Peacock didn’t see the skepticism that Matthews saw. However, a very healthy skepticism would have been in order.

These military men and women had to be evaluating the words they were hearing that night and comparing them to words they had heard their President say at other times.

Jan. 26, 2009: “All too often the United States starts by dictating … and we don’t always know all the factors that are involved. So let’s listen. And I think if we do that, then there’s a possibility at least of achieving some breakthroughs. … My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect.” – President Obama, in an interview with Al Arabiya

That is tremendously conciliatory language to use when talking with Al Arabiya journalists while soldiers are dying in the middle east.

April 2, 2009: “I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world.” – President Obama, at G20 summit in London

The graves of American soldiers all across the world are silent testimony to the greatness of America’s standing in the world. Perhaps these future leaders of men were wondering what kind of leader would make such a crass and self-serving statement while outside of our country. Perhaps some of them were wondering what this President might be saying at some future date while they were fighting in some distant country to save the democracy that Obama was “fundamentally” changing into socialism. Perhaps some of them were comparing this President’s actions with those of Winston Churchill who said “When I am abroad, I always make it a rule never to criticize or attack the government of my own country”.

April 2, 2009: “It is true, as my Italian friend has said, that the (economic) crisis began in the U.S. I take responsibility, even if I wasn’t even president at the time.” – President Obama, at the G20 in London, as reported by Germany’s Der Spiegel.

Yet another apology, and a totally inaccurate statement, at an inappropriate location and the loss of another opportunity to speak to America’s strengths preserved by generations of soldiers and earmarked by many square miles of overseas American military cemeteries.

April 6: “I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that the trust that binds us has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.” – President Obama, in Ankara, Turkey

Certainly some might be saying “Tell it to the Ayatollah’s!”

It would be difficult to criticize the young men and women at West Point for possibly reflecting on this President’s comments while he was making a war speech that didn’t even support the minimum recommendation of his battlefield commander. Perhaps some of them were wondering if they would be among the last officers leading men on a dangerous battlefield fighting a rear guard action 18 months from then as they were making the withdrawal from Afganistan that the commander-in-chief was pre-announcing to the enemy.

By way of contrast, it apparently was easy for Chris Matthews to make these criticisms and name these future defenders of a free America the “enemy camp”. It was apparently easy for Chris Matthews to name this oldest military academy in our country and the site of a major Revolutionary War stand by George Washington a “strange venue” for a major war speech about troop deployment. Perhaps Matthews thought that Paddy’s Irish Pub would be more appropriate.

You see, it wasn’t just Matthew’s comment about West Point being the enemy camp that was so crassly inappropriate. It was his criticism of the cadets and their officers. It was his perception of “resentment, criticism” that was neither voiced nor visible to others. Perhaps Matthews was seeing what he wanted to see because he didn’t sense a collective tingle running up the legs of all these uniformed people at the sight of the man Matthews has expressed such gushing adoration for. It was Matthews’ sense of this entirely appropriate hall named for one of our greatest defenders of democracy against socialism, Marxism and fascism as a “strange venue”.

Many in this “crowd” that Matthew’s was so critical of will make a career of defending our country and declaring themselves ready to defend their President with their lives even if their President was overseas inappropriately apologizing for our great country and our courageous military. Quite a few will find themselves in the real “enemy camp” fighting, and perhaps dying, for Chris Matthews right to be crass.

Chris Matthews apologized later in his telecast for calling Eisenhower Hall the “enemy camp”. In the context of the rest of his words on this subject his apology can’t be accepted. It is clear that this journalist with decades of experience on the national level meant exactly what he said. His apology smacks of the man who got caught in an illegal or embarrassing act begging forgiveness not because he is sorry but because he got caught.

Mr. Matthews, you are simply a scoundrel whose words precisely describe your feeling toward our military and our future military leaders. You will receive no forgiveness here.

Popularity: unranked [?]

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

The Real “Enemy Camp”

Written by PeacockWatch on December 4, 2009.

If Chris Matthews were a young cub reporter one might say he was indiscreet in his comments. But he is not. He has decades of experience. According to his MSNBC News biography:

“Matthews spent 15 years in politics and government: he worked in the White House for four years under President Jimmy Carter as a Presidential speechwriter and on the Government Reorganization Project, in the U.S. Senate for five years on the staffs of Senator Frank Moss (Utah) and Senator Edmund Muskie (Maine), and was the top aide for Speaker of the House Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill, Jr. for six years.”

Matthews was a print journalist for 15 years and has been with CNBC and MSNBC since 1997.

One could say he has a lot of experience and it is clear that he is very solid in his liberal beliefs. So, when he says about Obama’s visit to West Point that “he went to maybe the enemy camp tonight” Matthews is saying what he means.

It is interesting that Matthews observes about the West Point cadets and their officers that he “didn’t see a lot of warmth in that crowd”. To some extent that could have been because “that crowd”, ready to dedicate their lives to democracy and freedom, had already been in their seats for four to five hours for security reasons while waiting for the commander-in-chief that they have already sworn allegiance to upon entering the academy. Moreover, Matthews opines that the “crowd” seems to be regarding Obama with “if not resentment, skepticism”. Mr. Matthews and Peacock must have been watching two different presentations because Peacock saw none of that. However, a healthy skepticism from these soldiers might have been appropriate. After all this Commander-in-Chief might be ordering any and all of them off to war upon their graduation. It would certainly be appropriate for them, as leaders in training, to be taking the measure of the man. As students in one of the best universities in the world they would certainly have done their homework and known much about their top leader.

These soldier leaders in training would understand the irony of listening to this man in this commemorative Eisenhower Hall while knowing that he is making all the political and economic moves required to transition our country from a free democracy to a socialist state. They would also be fully aware that they are the current link in a chain of military men going back over 200 years who fought, got maimed or died to preserve our democracy that our founding fathers gave their lives, fortunes and sacred honor for. Peacock saw a lot of tired faces of hard working students in the crowd. Peacock saw a lot of people paying close attention and seeming to evaluate what they were hearing. Peacock didn’t see the skepticism that Matthews saw. However, a very healthy skepticism would have been in order.

These military men and women had to be evaluating the words they were hearing that night and comparing them to words they had heard their President say at other times.

Jan. 26, 2009: “All too often the United States starts by dictating … and we don’t always know all the factors that are involved. So let’s listen. And I think if we do that, then there’s a possibility at least of achieving some breakthroughs. … My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are

not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect.” – President Obama, in an interview with Al Arabiya.

That is tremendously conciliatory language to use when talking with Al Arabiya journalists while soldiers are dying in the middle east.

April 2, 2009: “I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world.” – President Obama, at G20 summit in London.

The graves of American soldiers all across the world are silent testimony to the greatness of America’s standing in the world. Perhaps these future leaders of men were wondering what kind of leader would make such a crass and self-serving statement while outside of our country. Perhaps some of them were wondering what this President might be saying at some future date while they were fighting in some distant country to save the democracy that Obama was “fundamentally” changing into socialism. Perhaps some of them were comparing this President’s actions with those of Winston Churchill who said “When I am abroad, I always make it a rule never to criticize or attack the government of my own country”.

April 2, 2009: “It is true, as my Italian friend has said, that the (economic) crisis began in the U.S. I take responsibility, even if I wasn’t even president at the time.” – President Obama, at the G20 in London, as reported by Germany’s Der Spiegel.

Yet another apology, and a totally inaccurate statement, at an inappropriate location and the loss of another opportunity to speak to America’s strengths preserved by generations of soldiers and earmarked by many square miles of overseas American military cemeteries.

April 6: “I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that the trust that binds us has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. Let me say this as clearly as I can: the United States is not at war with Islam.” – President Obama, in Ankara, Turkey

Certainly some might be saying “Tell it to the Ayatollah’s!”

It would be difficult to criticize the young men and women at West Point for possibly reflecting on this President’s comments while he was making a war speech that didn’t even support the minimum recommendation of his battlefield commander. Perhaps some of them were wondering if they would be among the last officers leading men on a dangerous battlefield fighting a rear guard action 18 months from then as they were making the withdrawal from Afganistan that the commander-in-chief was pre-announcing to the enemy.

By way of contrast, it apparently was easy for Chris Matthews to make these criticisms and name these future defenders of a free America the “enemy camp”. It was apparently easy for Chris Matthews to name this oldest military academy in our country and the site of a major Revolutionary War stand by George Washington a “strange venue” for a major war speech about troop deployment. Perhaps Matthews thought that Paddy’s Irish Pub would be more appropriate.

You see, it wasn’t just Matthew’s comment about West Point being the enemy camp that was so crassly inappropriate. It was his criticism of the cadets and their officers. It was his perception of “resentment, criticism” that was neither voiced nor visible to others. Perhaps Matthews was seeing what he wanted to see because he didn’t sense a collective tingle running up the legs of all these uniformed people at the sight of the man Matthews has expressed such gushing adoration for. It was Matthews’ sense of this entirely appropriate hall named for one of our greatest defenders of democracy against socialism, Marxism and fascism as a “strange venue”.

Many in this “crowd” that Matthew’s was so critical of will make a career of defending our country and declaring themselves ready to defend their President with their lives even if their President was overseas inappropriately apologizing for our great country and our courageous military. Quite a few will find themselves in the real “enemy camp” fighting, and perhaps dying, for Chris Matthews right to be crass.

Chris Matthews apologized later in his telecast for calling Eisenhower Hall the “enemy camp”. In the context of the rest of his words on this subject his apology can’t be accepted. It is clear that this journalist with decades of experience on the national level meant exactly what he said. His apology smacks of the man who got caught in an illegal or embarrassing act begging forgiveness not because he is sorry but because he got caught.

Mr. Matthews, you are simply a scoundrel whose words precisely describe your feeling toward our military and our future military leaders. You will receive no forgiveness here.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Extreme Hypocrisy

Written by PeacockWatch on September 24, 2009.

Watching Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann preach gospel from the GE/NBC written bible would be amusing if the effect wasn’t so damaging to the distribution of truth. But then maybe they are in the business of the “redistribution” of truth. Apparently these liberal propagandists, and failed president Jimmy Carter, don’t understand that people don’t oppose Obama because of his race or because of his party. That message is a Democratic Party and GE/NBC smoke screen. Most Americans oppose Obama’s plans because he wants services best provided by a commercial enterprise to be run by government with an abysmal record of financial incompetence; because he wants wealth accumulated by Americans through self-reliance and hard work to be redistributed through an outrageous, increasingly complex tax system; and because he wants to increase the size of a government that has become increasingly inefficient and bloated over the last century.

Let’s look at this from the standpoint of the hard-working, self-sufficient American striving every day to accumulate enough “wealth” to keep their family fed, clothed and sheltered with enough left over for educating their children and possibly enjoying retirement.

Local governments own golf courses, swimming pools and professional music venues. Almost all of those all across the country are losing money. And they do so year after year after year. But local governments excuse that loss by saying that these government-owned facilities improve the overall environment and make their municipality more attractive to new residents and businesses. Yet most of those local governments have shown a trend to increase local taxes over time. For governments this is a “pay raise” on top of a “pay raise”. And these governments still can’t make ends meet.

At the risk of over explaining this let’s talk about what tax rate increases really mean. If the sales and income tax rate is fixed then governments get more money every time a residents gets a pay raise. Let’s be clear — whenever residents get a pay increase the local, state and federal governments also get an automatic pay increase. However, all levels of government are almost consistently striving to increase the tax rate because they can’t live with the same income increases that the rest of us have to live with. Governments want and get an increase on top of the increase. Government income is increasing at a faster rate than individual income!

Clearly something isn’t working in government. If a private corporation increased its prices at the same rate that government increases its tax demand then that corporation would go out of business because potential customers would flock to the competitor’s product.

Could that be why the most liberal in the federal government don’t want competition for a government health care program? They know the government can’t compete on a level playing field!

This is why Americans don’t want government to run a national health program. Local governments can’t even make a profit off of golf courses, swimming pools and professional entertainment venues which they run without having to pay taxes on their revenue. (That is massively unfair competition against commercial enterprise.) State governments across the country, in spite of demanding increased revenue on top of the automatic increase they get when their residents get pay raises, are incurring massive deficits. Deficits so large that if they were a corporation they would have to file bankruptcy. The federal government over the last 70 years has  mismanaged social security and associated programs so badly that all of them, according the government that runs them, will be bankrupt within 100 years after they were started.

The government, Republican or Democrat, on any level has shown itself to be incompetent to run a business enterprise — and insurance is a business enterprise. Even the FDIC is showing horrible signs of economic problems.

Keith and Chris need to get off of the GE/NBC/liberal government bandwagon of information redistribution. Within the general population this isn’t about citizen Republicans vs. citizen Democrats and it isn’t an issue of color. It is about Americans who believe in small government and capitalism vs. Americans who believe in large government and increasing socialism. It is about Americans who believe in self reliance vs. Americans who believe in redistributing the wealth.

Chris and Keith either don’t understand this or they are just trying to keep their jobs within the GE/NBC corporation with strong ties to government contracts.

We definitely need to be very careful and suspicious of the administration’s desire to push their new series of proposals through congress at record speed. There is a conventional wisdom in government that when a government tries to push through a new bill in record time that it has high probability of becoming bad law.

PeacockWatch would like to hear from you about this.

Popularity: 41% [?]

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon